[Media Note: Vanderbilt has a 24/7 TV and radio studio with a dedicated fiber optic line and ISDN line. Use of the TV studio with Vanderbilt experts is free, except for reserving fiber time. A high resolution photo of Nicolas Bollen is available here.]
As hedge funds come under tighter scrutiny with the federal government’s recently passed financial reforms package, Vanderbilt Owen Graduate School of Management professor Nicolas Bollen has identified several funds that could pose a fraud risk similar to the kind undertaken by Bernie Madoff, who bilked investors out of $65 billion.
In a study examining the effectiveness of five performance flags used to detect hedge fund fraud, Bollen compared 195 “problem” funds against a pool of 8,575 “non-problem” hedge funds. He found that some funds in the group that did not have violations reported against them actually displayed characteristics signaling a risk of fraud.
“Our performance flags may be indicating that some of the non-problem funds are in fact at higher risk of fraud, but have not yet been charged with any violations,” said Bollen.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has already adopted screening tools similar to those tested by Bollen in the wake of the Madoff scandal, though their use could grow under the new financial reforms package. The performance flags are also like the analytical tools used by whistleblower Mark Markopolos to alert authorities to irregularities with Madoff’s investments as early as 2000.
“The approach we’re validating for hedge fund monitoring is in some ways similar to the one used by the IRS to determine which tax returns to audit,” Bollen said. “By statistically parsing through funds and identifying ‘red flags,’ we demonstrate financial regulation can work without being prohibitively expensive.”
Five indicators for monitoring hedge fund fraud:
1. A kink in the fund’s distribution of returns at zero
A statistical test will show a lack of smoothness – a kink – in a hedge fund’s distribution of reported returns at zero. This may indicate an effort to avoid reporting a loss by inflating returns in one month, then later reversing the overstatements. When calculating returns on a bimonthly basis, the study found that this kink disappears.
2. A low correlation with other assets
Hedge fund returns should be correlated with a set of investment “style factors,” which researchers developed to mimic well-known hedge fund trading strategies. A low degree of correlation could be the result of a hedge fund actually making good on its promise to deliver unique returns. However, Bollen argues that if no reliable correlation exists, it is likely that the hedge fund returns are distorted, perhaps in an effort to mask risk, or, as in the case of Madoff, because they were being fabricated.
3. Artificially smooth returns
Returns that show a low level of volatility and a positive serial correlation could be the result of hedge fund managers purposely smoothing returns by reporting moving averages. Research has shown that moving averages feature lower volatility than raw observations, and will possess serial correlation even when raw observations have none.
4. Losses being reported differently than gains
When the serial correlation is conditional on a particular variable, it may point to a hedge fund manager’s desire to smooth losses by delaying reports of poor performance, while fully reporting gains when they occur in hopes of winning investor capital.
5. Poor data quality
Portfolios can be analyzed for “man-made” data patterns that include characteristics such as too many returns exactly equal to zero, too few unique returns, too long a string of identical returns and an extremely low percentage of negative returns. On the last point, the authors say there would naturally be very few reported losses if returns were being fabricated, such as in a Ponzi scheme.
Bollen also noted that this so-called performance flag approach could be applied to deter fraud in a wide range of investments.
“The flags might be different but the basic strategy is the same,” he said. “The information we are providing can also benefit investment advisers by making them aware that pre-screening can be a very effective way to protect client portfolios. They will have additional means to identify potential investments that should require especially careful due diligence.”
Vanderbilt Owen Graduate School of Management is ranked as a top institution by BusinessWeek, The Wall Street Journal, U.S. News & World Report, Financial Times and Forbes.