The Congressional Black Caucus has not been an effective voice for working-class Americans on the issue of immigration reform.
African Americans should expect and demand more from the CBC, because its members have elected to organize as a racial caucus. By doing so, CBC members have placed upon themselves the obligation to represent the interests of the millions of black constituents who have faithfully and repeatedly sent them to Washington.
Instead, CBC members have ignored social-science studies, congressional testimony and census data documenting the harm that high levels of immigration have caused and are continuing to have on low-wage, low-skill workers. Intervention is needed. African Americans and their allies should hold CBC members and other Democrats accountable for failing to represent the interests of their constituents.
It was Sen. Chuck Schumer, New York Democrat, who chaired the Senate committee that held hearings on black male unemployment in spring of 2007. James Wright, a journalist writing for Afro-American News, reported that Sen. Barack Obama, Illinois Democrat, chose not to sit on Mr. Schumer’s committee. At the time that Mr. Wright’s newspaper went to press in March, no CBC representatives were seated on the bicameral committee of House and Senate members.
Given their past stances, CBC members can be expected to support amnesty for illegal immigrants and the proposed new guest-worker program that will further disadvantage working-class Americans and those who will compete with the new immigrants for housing, health care, education and other benefits provided to low- and moderate-income Americans.
We need only focus on unemployment to get an idea of how African Americans and other historically disadvantaged groups are adversely affected by high levels of immigration. Consider that black unemployment rates are usually double the rate of whites and are higher than the rates of Hispanics. For example, in April 2007, the national unemployment rate was 4.5 percent. The black unemployment rate was 8.2 percent, with the rate for black males at 9.7 percent. The rate for Hispanics was 5.4 percent. Moreover, the Bureau of Labor statistics has forecast that in the next seven years the Hispanic labor force will be 6.3 million workers greater than the black workforce. As well, by 2014, the black workforce will lag behind the Hispanics, Asians and white non-Hispanics in labor-force participation.
Employed African Americans include a disproportionate percentage of high-school dropouts and graduates who compete directly with legal and illegal immigrants for low-wage, low-skill jobs.
New immigrants arriving since 1990 have increased the supply of labor by 25 percent for the kinds of jobs traditionally taken by poorly educated Americans. Using data from 2000-2004, Steven Camarota of the Center for Immigration Studies has found that while immigrant workers constituted 15 percent of the U.S. labor force, they were a whopping 40 percent of workers without high-school diplomas. Only 12 percent had greater than a high school diploma.
The greatest competition for low-skill jobs is now occurring among people at the margins of society, a multiracial group that includes poorly educated blacks, whites and Hispanics. It is no wonder members of the working-class are the ones most upset about high levels of immigration.
Whether the topic is education, poverty, housing, health care or unemployment, blacks remain clustered at the bottom of the ladder in a most desperate situation. Therefore, their need for representation in Congress is ongoing — the more vigorous, the better.
The interests of American citizens should trump any obligations to illegal immigrants who have willfully broken the nation’s laws and demanded rights and privileges not guaranteed by the Constitution. Often these immigrants show open hostility and disdain for African Americans, the very group whose civil-rights movement has benefitted them enormously.
CBC members should be expected to bring more to their districts than descriptive representation and loud rhetoric about race and rights. Effectively representing their constituents should trump symbolism and the Caucus’s tendency to pursue abstract rights for imagined coalition partners. If the CBC is to fulfill its goals and obligations to America, it must be actively involved in shaping immigration legislation to take into consideration the needs of the most vulnerable Americans.
(Cambridge University Press, 2007). Carol M. Swain, professor of political science and law at Vanderbilt University, is the editor of Debating Immigration. This op-ed originally ran in The Washington Times on May 25, 2007.
Media contact: Amy Wolf, (615) 322-NEWS
amy.wolf@vanderbilt.edu