Skip to Content
Congress is taking up the debate over comprehensive immigration reform yet again. Vanderbilt has a diverse array of experts researching various aspects of the immigration debate.
Professor of Sociology Katharine Donato studies how United States and Mexican immigration policies affect both countries – particularly in the areas of employment, education, health and social services. About two-thirds of the United States’ immigrant population comes from Mexico, and it is facing tougher U.S. immigration polices than two decades ago when federal legislation designed to reduce undocumented workers was first passed. Donato says stricter border controls result in more unauthorized migrants in the United States, and she is optimistic about the newly emerging bipartisan efforts toward immigration reform. She has written numerous papers on immigration and, last year, she published a paper, “What Do We Know About Undocumented Migration?” (Annual Review of Sociology) and can be read here. She edited and contributed to a special volume called Continental Divides: International Migration in the Americas.
Professor of Political Science and Law Carol Swain has written and studied immigration reform in the United States. She thinks President Obama’s push for one step immigration reform is a mistake. “The proposed immigration proposals recycle old ideas, while avoiding thorny issues. Until policy makers undertake a cost/benefit analysis of the impact of mass legalization on entitlement programs and employment prospects of native-born workers, they cannot effectively reform immigration. Stiffer penalties for being in the country illegally, chain immigration through family reunification, and the impact on African Americans and legal immigrants must be part of the discussion,” said Swain.
Swain edited and contributed to a book of essays called Debating Immigration (here). There she said that illegal immigration is hurting African-Americans because they are losing more jobs to illegal immigrants than other racial or ethnic groups, yet low-income black workers don’t have political input in the debate. See a video of Swain in the VUStar studio (here).
Assistant Professor of Political Science Efrén O. Pérez’s research encompasses political psychology and public opinion, with an emphasis on racial and ethnic politics. Pérez’s current research includes a book on implicit bias and U.S. immigration politics, which is funded by the National Science Foundation. Pérez is cautiously optimistic about the prospect of immigration reform, but he doesn’t think that House legislators who strongly opposed immigration reform last time around are going to pass any meaningful reforms.
“Now, people will say that Republicans have had a change of heart because of their poor showing among Latinos. The problem is that Republicans never win a majority of the Latino vote. Simply put, if immigration reform passes it is more likely to help Democrats, not Republicans, win over more Latinos,” said Pérez. See a video of Pérez explaining what he thinks is wrong with current immigration policy in the VUStar studio (here).
Amy Wolf, (615) 322-NEWS
Law, Business and Politics, releases, Research Arts and Science, Carol Swain, congress, Debate, Efren Perez, immigrants, immigration, katherine donato, law school, mexico, political science, undocumented workers
There are lots of ways to keep up with Vanderbilt research news. Choose your preferred method:
Sign up for the weekly Research News @Vanderbilt e-newsletter.